Research · HVLS 2027-1 results

Who bought HUD’s HVLS 2027-1 loans — and what they paid for Florida

HUD has published the results of the largest vacant loan sale it has run. Twenty-one buyers took 3,921 loans at 61 cents on the broker’s dollar. Florida was the second-largest state by loan count and the largest by balance, ten of the twenty-one buyers took a piece of it, and four of them took almost all of it.

Investor Trustee Services  ·   ·  Analysis of HUD’s HVLS 2027-1 Sale Results Summary · sale date October 27, 2026

3,921Loans sold
$588.9MTotal winning bids
61%Of broker price opinion
21Winning bidders

HUD’s results summary for HVLS 2027-1 reports each winning bidder’s loans by state. It does not report each state’s loans by bidder. The Florida table below is that second view, reconciled from the twenty-one per-bidder state tables; its loan counts sum exactly to the 292 Florida loans the state table reports. As far as Investor Trustee Services is aware, it has not been published elsewhere.

The national totals, the full list of winning bidders and HUD’s own definitions follow it.

Florida: 292 loans, and the biggest book in the sale

Texas had the most loans in the sale, 299 to Florida’s 292. By dollars the order reverses. Florida’s loans carried $86,920,551 of updated loan balance against Texas’s $75,964,616, and $74,631,650 of broker price opinion value against Texas’s $71,513,800. Florida’s balance is 7.3% of the national updated loan balance.

StateLoansUpdated loan balanceBPO value
Texas299$75,964,616$71,513,800
Florida292$86,920,551$74,631,650

Winning bids on the Florida loans totaled $45,139,680: 60.5% of the Florida broker price opinion value, and 51.9% of the Florida updated loan balance. About 52 cents on the dollar of what is owed.

Who bought Florida

Ten of the twenty-one winning bidders took at least one Florida loan. Four of them took 274 of the 292.

Winning bidderFlorida loansUpdated loan balance
GITSIT Solutions, LLC93$25,805,307
Sarles Mortgage Acquisition Company, LLC84$22,959,819
Upland Mortgage Acquisition Company III, LLC54$18,185,705
VRMTG ACQ, LLC43$14,480,182
The Headlands Foundation5$1,990,093
HGF Management Company, LLC4$1,312,159
PLAZA BELMONT LLC4$978,119
WINDSTREAM CAPITAL LLC3$690,018
Beltway Capital, LLC1$335,046
First Iron Capital LLC1$184,102
Florida total (Table 3.1)292$86,920,551

Reconciled from HUD’s per-bidder state tables (Tables 3.2–3.22). The loan counts sum exactly to the state table’s 292; the balances sum to within $1 of its $86,920,551, a rounding difference in HUD’s own tables.

Four buyers took 94% of Florida. GITSIT Solutions, Sarles Mortgage Acquisition Company, Upland Mortgage Acquisition Company III and VRMTG ACQ hold 274 of the 292 loans between them. The other six Florida buyers hold eighteen.

Two of them are the Florida specialists of this sale. Florida is 37% of Sarles’s entire pool by updated loan balance, and 33% of Upland III’s. GITSIT, which took the most Florida loans, took them as part of a 2,144-loan national book; Florida is a small share of it.

What the public record does not say is what any one buyer paid for Florida. HUD’s per-bidder state tables report updated loan balance only. Each bidder’s price is published as a single percentage of broker price opinion across its whole pool, so a buyer-level Florida price is not in the summary and is not stated here.

The national picture: one bid, three denominators

HUD reports the sale’s $588,940,679 of winning bids against three balances, and the same bids look very different against each.

Measured againstSale totalBids as %
Unpaid principal balance — principal only$515,538,427114%
Updated loan balance — principal plus accrued interest, mortgage insurance premium, service fees and servicing advances$1,195,862,49549%
Broker price opinion value — the estimated market value of the houses$961,809,01561%

Bids can be 114% of principal and 49% of the balance at the same time. The gap between the two denominators is years of accrued interest, insurance premium, fees and advances on loans whose borrowers have died: the updated balance is more than double the principal. Paying 114% of principal is paying 49% of what is owed.

Only the percentage of broker price opinion says anything about the houses themselves, which is why it is the figure worth tracking from sale to sale. HVLS 2026-1 cleared at 69.4% of BPO; this sale cleared at 61%.

All twenty-one winning bidders

Sorted by loan count. The bid column is each bidder’s winning bid as a percentage of the broker price opinion value of its own pool.

Winning bidderLoansUpdated loan balanceBid, % of BPO
GITSIT Solutions, LLC2,144$609,677,40060%
VRMTG ACQ, LLC912$252,938,81758%
Sarles Mortgage Acquisition Company, LLC189$62,370,72766%
Upland Mortgage Acquisition Company III, LLC162$55,925,87266%
Insource East Properties, Inc.125$58,027,21668%
FLC-SP Structured LLC83$40,334,37268%
Beltway Capital, LLC45$18,933,43859%
WINDSTREAM CAPITAL LLC44$20,343,74566%
PLAZA BELMONT LLC41$13,905,43279%
First Iron Capital LLC23$4,059,47611%
The Headlands Foundation22$8,056,66965%
Echelon Capital, LLC (all Puerto Rico)22$6,680,36169%
Oak Harbor Capital, LLC20$9,115,89063%
Tikva 2025 LLC18$3,461,65852%
HGF Management Company, LLC17$6,708,76268%
Creative Homes Pros LLC11$5,785,21272%
JIMS HOUSES LLC10$6,354,96461%
CCFM-Acquisitions LLC9$4,536,72272%
FAIRWORTH365, LLC9$3,241,02269%
ARK8$1,282,28480%
Legacy Impact Investors, LLC7$4,122,45670%

The spread: 11% to 80%

Winning bids ranged from 11% of broker price opinion, First Iron Capital’s 23 loans, to 80%, ARK’s eight. GITSIT Solutions alone took 2,144 loans, 55% of the sale, at 60%.

ARK80%
PLAZA BELMONT79%
Creative Homes Pros72%
CCFM-Acquisitions72%
Sarles Mortgage66%
GITSIT Solutions60%
VRMTG ACQ58%
Tikva 202552%
First Iron Capital11%

Winning bid as a percentage of broker price opinion, selected bidders. Sale total 61%.

A spread that wide on one afternoon’s auction is a reminder that pool composition drives price at least as much as market appetite does. Two bidders paying 11% and 80% of broker price opinion are not disagreeing about the same houses; they won different houses, in different places, with different title and condition behind them, and priced what they won.

Two terms HUD uses

Broker price opinion (BPO). An estimate of a property’s market value made by a licensed real estate professional from sales trends, the property’s condition and comparable sales. It is not an appraisal.

Updated loan balance. The unpaid principal plus accrued interest, accrued mortgage insurance premium, accrued service fees and servicing advances: everything owed on the loan, not only what was borrowed.

We buy what comes out the other side

Every loan in this sale ends as a house that somebody has to sell. Investor Trustee Services buys single-family assets from HVLS and HNVLS purchasers as principal, on its own balance sheet — the scattered residue that does not justify assembling a bulk trade, in states where a buyer holds too few to be worth a dedicated process. Vacant or occupied, clouded title priced in rather than excluded.

Email the desk

Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HVLS 2027-1 Sale Results Summary (FHA Office of Asset Sales), sale date October 27, 2026. Sale totals and the per-bidder loan counts, updated loan balances and bid percentages are Table 2.1; the state totals are Table 3.1; the Florida-by-bidder table is reconciled from the per-bidder state tables, Tables 3.2–3.22, which report updated loan balance only. The one derived figure is Florida’s bids as a share of Florida’s updated loan balance (45,139,680 / 86,920,551 = 51.9%); every other percentage is HUD’s. Loan counts are as reported at sale; loans delivered at settlement may be fewer where a loan loses qualifying status. Investor Trustee Services is not affiliated with, endorsed by, approved by, or acting on behalf of HUD or FHA. Nothing here is investment, legal or tax advice.